This blog post introduces Care Company TioHundra in Norrtälje, Sweden. This is a unique model of integrated care in Europe. I have had the opportunity to interview Peter Graf, Chief Operating Officer of TioHundra. Peter Graf talks openly about the challenges and the many opportunities that TioHundra faces. I have also had the opportunity to interview members of the staff and managers throughout the organization. Through these interviews, I have gained an understanding of the different parts of the company. I will tell you about my impressions of TioHundra in a series of blog posts. You can access the full interviews and all relevant background information from this case study on the ACCESS Health website.
An older person with multiple diseases often requires care from several healthcare and care providers. This elderly patient may travel to a local hospital for treatment. It is not uncommon that up to sixty people from various care organizations are involved in the care of an older individual with complex care needs. Patients with complex care needs require the services of both the county healthcare providers and the local municipal care organizations. As individuals in Sweden age, and as more people live with multiple diseases and have complex care needs, counties and municipalities realize the need for greater care coordination. Care coordination to meet the needs of the elderly is one of the greatest challenges in Swedish healthcare, witnessed by the large effort of the previous center right coalition government to improve care coordination in the program “The Most Ill Elderly” from 2010 to 2014. The previous government allocated over four billion Swedish kronor to improve the coordination of care for the most ill elderly. TioHundra shows that their model of integrated care already works well. During the program The Most Ill Elderly, TioHundra received funding based on the results they displayed in their work for the most elderly ill. These results included a reduction in unsuitable medication for the elderly and shorter wait times in the emergency room, among other areas.
Elsewhere in Sweden, regional governments manage the healthcare provision while local governments provide homecare and social care. Well defined areas of responsibility ensure that each provider in healthcare and in social care can focus on a range of services. In theory, the specialization of each level of government ensures that citizens obtain the healthcare and homecare they need. In practice, the division of responsibilities causes delays in service delivery, and at times, it compromises the quality of care. Regional and local governments use different communications systems, have distinctive work cultures, and use individual terminologies. Older frail patients, among other groups, suffer when healthcare providers fail to communicate effectively across organizations. TioHundra overcomes many problems of care coordination. Instead of coordinating care across organizations, TioHundra merged multiple care providers, now operating as one large healthcare and care system. This merger entails one of the largest regional reforms of Swedish healthcare since the Nobel Reform in 1992.
Care Company TioHundra is a public healthcare company that provides integrated care in Norrtälje, a city one hour north of Stockholm in Sweden. TioHundra operates an emergency hospital, six primary healthcare clinics, and a home healthcare organization for patients who are unable to travel to obtain care. It also manages social care and homecare organizations. The company runs nine nursing homes and it has 3,500 employees, including healthcare professionals and administrative staff.
To improve the quality of healthcare and to overcome the care coordination problems of regional and local administrations, Norrtälje and the Stockholm County Council established TioHundra in 2006.
The guiding philosophy of TioHundra is to construct an integrated healthcare system. The objective is to be the leader in integrated care in Sweden, and to be the number one choice of care provider in Norrtälje. The management approach centers on constant improvements. Managers and employees at all levels of the company identify areas for improvement, suggest new routines, and implement changes. The idea is to constantly improve service delivery and employee satisfaction.
Improved Care, Lower Cost
The ability to turn around negative operating results of previous years into a positive net result helped to convince politicians in the region that TioHundra improves the quality of care while lowering the delivery costs. Results from the employee survey show that the company employs a more satisfied workforce in 2014 than in 2013.
TioHundra manages to overcome certain problems of care coordination that persist in other regions and in other municipalities. Formal and informal channels of communication improve the transfer of information between different departments. Patient data is shared throughout the organization with the help of read only functions in patient journals. Weekly meetings of the management team foster an atmosphere of cooperation. Where disagreement occurs, the meetings serve as an arena for constructive debate.
TioHundra obtains one pool of financial resources from municipal and county taxes. Elsewhere, counties raise taxes for healthcare while municipalities raise separate taxes for social care. Budget silos prevent counties and municipalities to coordinate care in other parts of Sweden. One level of government is sometimes reluctant to deliver a service it considers to be the responsibility of the other level of government. The organizational structure of TioHundra allows this problem to be overcome through a lateral integration of caregivers from the county and the municipality.
In summary, TioHundra is a unique healthcare company. There are no other companies like TioHundra in Sweden. Few similar care organizations exist elsewhere in the Nordic countries. TioHundra reported a balanced budge for the first time in 2014. It also marked a year where management recorded improvements in employee satisfaction. TioHundra delivers healthcare of high quality at relatively low costs. The company has reduced the number of medications per older patient, reduced the prescription of unsuitable medications for the elderly, and it has shortened emergency room wait times for this patient group.
It remains to be seen how the integrated care model of TioHundra evolves. A transition in 2015 away from a focus on balancing the budget, towards operational and organizational changes is already noticeable. This is a young company with an eager management team. If the quality of care improves dramatically, and if the costs of healthcare can be contained in Norrtälje, other counties and municipalities may look into adopting the model of TioHundra.
 De mest sjuka äldre
I spent two days participating in a conference in Stockholm on the topic of welfare technology. Welfare technology is a term that encompasses a wide range of information and communications technologies, alarms, aids, devices in the home, and other technologies that help the elderly or people with disabilities. The official definition states,
“Welfare technology is the knowledge and the use of technologies that can contribute to increased safety, activity, participation, and independence for people with disabilities and their families. Welfare technology can also support independent living, and it can prevent or supplement healthcare and social care needs. Welfare technology can help to improve resource utilization and quality in the welfare sector, and it can be economically viable.”
This conference was the first in Stockholm on the theme of welfare technology. I hope it will become a permanent and annual event.
The conference featured panel debates, lectures, and a round table discussion. Companies showcased their latest products. Economists lectured on the economics of technology in healthcare and social care. Lawyers described the legal framework and the regulation of technology. Participants exchanged ideas and networked.
As a researcher for ACCESS Health, I immersed myself in the latest thinking on welfare technology. I examined how the fusion of a bicycle, a computer game, and a chair can improve the health of the elderly. Read about the company that has developed this bicycle that allows a biker with poor balance to cycle in a three dimensional environment of his or her choosing.
The idea of the bike is to stimulate more exercise. Equipment like this can turn exercise into an enjoyable experience for those who have suffered injuries and face months of painful rehabilitation. It can also encourage exercise in those who feel uncomfortable at a normal gym. Several municipalities in Sweden purchase the bikes, and the spinoff product, a treadmill that comes with a rounded screen to create the illusion of outside walking. This treadmill takes the person into a three dimensional reality. It works like a game. When the person looks to the left, the picture moves to the left. The user experiences a simulation of taking a stroll outside. The images are developed with Google street view. The tablet on the treadmill allows the user to play a quiz game while strolling in the forest. The questions are viewed on the large curved screen. The answers are recorded on the tablet. Developers believe that the gamification of exercise can enhance the user experience for the elderly.
The municipalities allow elderly citizens to come to community centers and to keep physically active. Perhaps we are witnessing the infancy of gyms with equipment developed for people over the age of seventy. This age group can benefit from exercise that strengthens muscles and trains the heart. Most public gyms do a poor job of installing exercise equipment and designing facilities that suit the needs of the elderly. I have been pleased to observe that developments in this area already benefit active older citizens.
I looked at the newest products on the market for safety alarm watches for patients who suffer from dementia, such as watches with positioning systems and alarms. I examined intelligent beds, which hold sensors in the mattress. The sensors notify caregiver personnel or are connected to your computer at home. The sensors highlight where there is pressure in the bed so that a caregiver can make adjustments and help the user avoid ulcers, which are a common result of pressure and poor blood circulation in certain areas of the body. The economists who participated in the conference, including Dr. Åke Dahlberg, calculate that these sorts of devices are so cost effective that the payer or user breaks even within one year of use. These calculations factor in the costs of treating an ulcer, which may demand that a patient visit a hospital twice a week.
The intelligent bed is an innovation produced at the Health Technology Center in Halland, in the south of Sweden. The bed is just one of many new technologies in the field of homecare and elder care that shows how patients can use smart technologies at home to prevent diseases and ulcers. These images display what nursing homes of the future may look like. The sensor, which goes under the mattress, can record your breathing and your pattern of sleep. To the right, a computer screen is visible. Doctors can use the data remotely to check up on you in the middle of the night and decide if you may need assistance at home.
You can read more about welfare technology in my upcoming case studies on the ACCESS Health website. I will shed light on the legal aspects of the use of technology in elder care. I will also examine the ethical aspects and discuss the economics behind the introduction of more technology in sectors like homecare, which largely center on personal meetings between caregivers and patients. This is an exciting area of development and shows promising results already. Patients, caregivers, and society at large stand to benefit from the technological advances in this sector. On the other hand, these technologies must be developed with the users in mind. The users are the healthcare staff, the homecare personnel, and the patients. A careful examination of patient needs and user friendliness for all of these groups must precede any introduction of technology in elder care and homecare. Far too many applications are developed without the involvement of the relevant consumers.
Previous waves of technology in these sectors illustrate that technology is powerful, and it will find users and needs for its applications. Previous waves of technology show that, in some areas, technology comes first and needs of the users come second. Developers apply technology from other fields to the elder care sector. This technology may not always be aligned with the needs of the users. The needs of the users must be the point of departure. Ideally, technology is not adopted from other fields; it is purposely constructed for older consumers, for caregivers, and for relatives. This is why the debate around technology is so important. The lecturers at the welfare technology conference stressed that they wanted to see technology that aligns with the needs of the users.
The previous generation of safety alarms for older people illustrates the point that technology does not meet the needs of users. The previous generation of safety alarms was connected to landline telephones. These alarms were a great invention for those who needed help at home. An older person who fell at home could use the alarm to contact a caregiver. The caregiver could come to the house and assist the person after the fall. However, the safety alarm could not be used on the balcony or outside of the house or apartment because it relied on the landline telephone. Sweden is introducing digital safety alarms on a large scale right now. The introduction has caused difficulties in many parts of the country, including disruptions in the signals to homecare personnel. Despite these difficulties, many municipalities are examining new digital alarms. In this process, some municipalities are introducing digital alarms that cannot be brought outside. The use of these types of alarms is a mistake. They confine the elderly to their apartments instead of encouraging an active lifestyle, which requires leaving the house.
Some new safety alarms, which often come in the form of watches to wear on the wrist, have Global Positioning System (GPS) technology built in, which allows a caregiver to turn on the navigation in his or her phone and navigate to the users, wherever he or she may be. The user can also talk into the watch and reach a caregiver, just like you would talk with someone on a mobile telephone. The image below illustrates a safety alarm with a positioning system and a clip on battery charger to ensure that the user does not lose the alarm when he or she charges the battery. Older versions of these watches must be taken off to be charged. A person with a cognitive impairment might easily forget to put the watch back on. Of course, the user must accept that he is traced when he wears the watch with a positioning system.
The new technology raises issues of privacy, data storage security, and surveillance of our elderly loved ones. Are we reducing or increasing their freedom with these alarms? As with any technology in the elder care sector, we must look at alternative solutions. No technology is perfect. Some technologies improve quality of life. If a technology has the potential to improve quality of life, we ought to examine the technology carefully.
In the case of wearable alarms with positioning systems, we either prohibit our loved ones from leaving the house alone because we are afraid that our elderly who suffer from dementia will become disoriented and wander off, or we allow these people to leave the house with a portable and traceable alarm system. Some people will be inherently skeptical of these technologies, perhaps more so in the wake of national programs on mass surveillance. There are arguments on both sides of this debate that need to be examined further, but the technologies show great potential.
The other ethical aspect we must think about carefully is consent. How do we obtain consent from users with cognitive disabilities? Is consent from relatives enough to allow the use of a safety alarm outside? It is impossible to offer one answer for all users and for all relatives. We must develop national guidelines that caregivers can follow. At each developmental stage, we must allow public lawyers to evaluate the legal implications of each technology. This will take time. We must be patient.
We must also allow individual caregivers and family members to decide what is best for their loved ones. What works for one user may be completely inappropriate for another user. Perhaps the user is bothered by a large safety alarm watch, scratching to take it off. In this case, I would think it wise to find other solutions. The elderly, like all of us, have different preferences. Common sense in the use of technologies will allow us to incorporate technology into sectors such as elder care and homecare. At the conference for welfare technology, nurses, lawyers, developers, and other participants raised these issues for debate.
Telia Healthcare, one of the largest telecom companies in Sweden, brought four showrooms to the technology fair in Stockholm. The product range HomeCare includes sensors in your bed. This bed is equipped with sensors in a pad that goes underneath the mattress. The pad warns if the patient lies still for too long or needs assistance to rise up. This pad is intended for use in care homes to guide the staff to the patient when the patient needs assistance. The blood pressure device on the bedside table can measure blood pressure and blood oxygen saturation. This information can be linked to patient records.
The sensors send signals via the Telia Healthcare application to caregivers or to the user. It is up to family members or users to decide where the text messages go. The bed below is equipped with a lamp gradually adapts to your sleeping pattern. It turns on a light in the morning to help you wake up. In cold, dark countries like Sweden, this may be a welcome device, although its healthcare application seems limited.
A smart sensor at the front door of a person’s house can notify a caregiver if the user leaves his or her house and wanders off. The text message alert, combined with a traceable and wearable alarm, like the safety alarm watches discussed above, helps the caregiver to locate a person that may have gotten lost. Technologies like this could help an aging population to live at home for longer. They can also improve the sense of well being and safety for users and for family members. Telia intends to sell these products to public caregiver organizations in the spring of 2015. Municipal organizations develop new guidelines on public procurement, which includes data encryption for this type of product.
The small white sensor in the top left corner of the medical cabinet will send a notification if the cabinet has not been opened for a certain amount of time. The scales in the images below send weight information to your computer or to your caregivers, via Bluetooth. Fluctuations in weight are an early sign of declining health in patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, for example. The text message alert will act as a reminder for you to take your medication or visit your doctor before you develop more serious symptoms. All of these technologies will help patients with chronic diseases to live at home for longer in the future. The scales for home use stores information on patient weight. The scales can notify caregivers if a patient collects additional fluids, which is an indicator of rising blood pressure. The scales send the information via Bluetooth to the caregiver’s mobile telephone.
Now, Telia is just one of many companies entering the growing market of homecare devices. It remains to be seen whether these specific products serve the needs of these patients, or whether Telia must improve or change their products. Telia runs pilot studies with several Swedish municipalities where they evaluate their products.
Telia installs cameras for use at home during the night, when someone might otherwise need to visit the person to check that everything is in order. Several municipalities in Sweden work with eHomecare. eHomecare uses a camera that is switched on for a few minutes at a time throughout the night to check that the user is alright. This type of technology replaces short visits by homecare personnel in the middle of the night, and several users prefer a camera to personal visits. My upcoming interviews with the managers of eHomecare in Västerås stad will be posted on the ACCESS Health website.
In summary, the welfare technology conference stimulated important debates on technology for the elderly. I will keep you up to date on this important topic in future blog posts and in my case studies. I hope to see technologies that benefit the elderly. I want to see more companies that involve all users early on in product development. As one participant in the conference put it, “only when all groups benefit from the technology, including the doctors, the patients, the caregivers, and the relatives, can we expect large scale adoption.” One final reflection comes to mind the day after the technology conference. Many municipalities had representatives at the conference. Few county councils were present. If counties and municipalities want to stay up to date on the latest technology, this conference is a good starting point!
In my previous blog post, I described the work of the Mobile Team for the Elderly in Uppsala, Sweden, a municipality of two hundred thousand. In this blog post, I will discuss some of the tangible benefits of the Mobile Team to the municipality, to patients, and to patients’ families.
Before I get started, I want to explain how healthcare and government is managed and financed in Sweden. Sweden is organized into municipalities. Several municipalities comprise each county. Uppsala County includes eight municipalities, including a municipality called Uppsala municipality (see the maps below). Uppsala County manages healthcare provision for all citizens in the county. The County Council in Uppsala is the payer of healthcare in the county. An autonomous government governs each Swedish municipality. Municipalities are responsible for social care for the elderly. The Mobile Service offers healthcare to the elderly, thus touching on the responsibility of both Uppsala municipality and Uppsala County. The Mobile Emergency Team serves the elderly only in Uppsala municipality, not the entire county.
Since the establishment of the Mobile Team in September 2011, fewer older patients visit the emergency room at Uppsala University Hospital. The Mobile Team started as a pilot project, which became a permanent unit in Uppsala, in January 2014.
Uppsala University Hospital is the only hospital with an emergency room in Uppsala County. Uppsala University Hospital is a public hospital financed by county taxes. Fewer visits to the emergency room thus save costs for the county. One visit to the emergency room is assumed to cost the county hospital 2,500 Swedish kronor (350 US dollars). In a conversation with the Mobile Team, one of the team’s two physicians, Magnus Gyllenspetz, explained to me that Uppsala County saves costs if the team makes three home visits per day. The savings come from reductions in the number of ambulance trips and the number of treatments provided in the hospital.
The total yearly cost of the Mobile Team is 3.5 million Swedish kronor (five hundred thousand US dollars). Uppsala County saves 2.5 million Swedish kronor (350,000 US dollars) on reduced outpatient treatments of the elderly alone. The largest savings are in the area of reduced hospitalizations for this group. Estimates for 2012 indicate that the Mobile Team saves Uppsala County over nine million Swedish kronor (1.2 million US dollars) annually on inpatient treatments for the elderly, excluding the costs of the Mobile Team.
Without the Mobile Team, an estimated 460 patients would have traveled to Uppsala University Hospital for treatment during the pilot phase, from September 2011 to January 2014. These 460 patients are “avoidable inpatients,” patients who can avoid a stay in hospital with treatment or social care assistance at home.
Apart from the economic benefits, patients like the Mobile Team. Fewer patients need to travel to the hospital. Fewer patients need to wait in emergency rooms. Fewer relatives worry about the health of their elderly loved ones. Fewer relatives must take time from work to help their relatives get to the emergency room. The Mobile Team cares for the ill residents in nursing homes. Because ill nursing home patients are the responsibility of the Mobile Team, the nurses in the nursing home are able to continue to care for all of their patients. If the nurse from the nursing home had to travel with the resident to the emergency room, then that nurse could not care for other patients.
Considering all the benefits, why is there only one Mobile Team with this setup in Sweden? Why do some older patients who need urgent care still travel to the emergency room? Is the Mobile Team too good to be true? How can we explain the fact that there is only one Mobile Team financed by a municipality and a county in Sweden?
There are many answers to these questions. Some older patients feel safer in emergency rooms. Most patients want the freedom to choose where to obtain treatment, at home or in emergency rooms, and some older patients feel safer in emergency rooms. People do not like to be told what kind of healthcare is best for them. Some simply do not know about the Mobile Team. Healthcare personnel follow routines. Some employees of the county do not work with the Mobile Team simply because it is not part of their routine. In my conversation with the five members of the Mobile Team, they expressed a desire to develop a new promotional strategy that would help the team reach out to more patients and partner organizations in the county.
The Mobile Team in Uppsala became a permanent unit one year ago, on January 1, 2014. I hope that other municipalities will establish Mobile Teams in the future, as more people become aware of the many benefits a Mobile Team can bring.
This is a happy thought for the New Year.
Happy New Year to all readers!
 “Final Report on the Mobile Emergency Team for the Elderly, 2013”. Author of the report: Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (Slutrapport för projekt kring de mest sjuka äldre Mobila hembesöksteamet i Uppsala, SKL)
Last week, I traveled to Uppsala from Stockholm to meet the team of the Mobile Emergency Team for the Elderly (Mobile Team). I am in the process of writing an in depth case study of the Mobile Team. This case study is part of our larger effort to identify good practice in integrated eldercare in a number of countries, including Sweden, Singapore, and the United States.
The Mobile Team is a leading example of integrated eldercare. Healthcare professionals can learn from the organization in general, and from its philosophy. As I build this case study, I will share with you some of my experiences with the process and what I am learning. In a series of blog posts, I will tell you about the Mobile Team and highlight different aspects of their work.
The Mobile Team started as a project in 2011, with financial support from the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions. Today, the Mobile Team is financed by Uppsala Municipality and the Uppsala County Council. Uppsala County is located just north of Stockholm County. All members of the Mobile Team are employed by Uppsala County, which covers sixty percent of the total costs of the Mobile Team. Uppsala Municipality covers the remaining forty percent of the costs. Both the county and the municipality raises funds through taxation.
The Mobile Team becomes involved with patient care through several different avenues: Nurses who work in homecare organizations contact the Mobile Team when they need a second opinion on a patient. Employees at care homes for the elderly contact them for advice. And ambulatory personnel coordinate their efforts with the Mobile Team.
The Mobile Team centers on the needs of the patient. The objective of the Mobile Team is to offer urgent care at home to people over the age of sixty five. Many older patients visit emergency rooms at hospitals for urgent but non life threatening care that can be treated at home. Often, these patients must wait for hours at emergency rooms because their illnesses are not as pressing as the illnesses of other patients seeking emergency care.
The Mobile Team performs urgent care right in patients’ homes. The Mobile Team is able to measure glucose, take blood tests, test urine, and perform electrocardiograms in the home. The team can treat patients with a range of drugs at home. They measure blood flow in arteries to assess if the blood circulation provides enough blood to the legs and to the brain. Blood circulation to all tissue is necessary to avoid stroke, for example. The team also measures saturation, or oxygen levels in the blood.
They treat patients with pariboy, an inhaler, if patients experience difficulty breathing. The team also treats minor wounds. When a patient needs treatment at the hospital, the Mobile Team coordinates with the ambulatory service to arrange transport.
Many older patients need support at home from multiple caregivers. The Mobile Team coordinates care with these caregivers, including professional homecare providers. If a patient visits the emergency room for an illness that can be treated at home, a municipal nurse of the Mobile Team, who works at the hospital emergency room, informs the patient of the Mobile Team. If possible, the municipal nurse informs the patient caregivers of the treatment that the Mobile Team can offer at home. If a patient needs urgent care a second time, the caregivers and the patient know about the Mobile Team.
The Mobile Team includes a nurse from the municipality and a doctor from the county. Sometimes, the municipal nurse needs assistance from the doctor to treat patients at home. In turn, the doctor often relies on the expertise of the municipal nurse about the full care plan for a particular patient. For example, the municipal nurse coordinates the effort of the Mobile Team with the effort of homecare teams. The Mobile Team and homecare teams work together to ensure that patients obtain the support they need to stay at home and recover. Both the healthcare and the social care needs of the patient are assessed. Many times, doctors assess healthcare needs in isolation. Homecare teams assess social care needs. The Mobile Team can help provide for these needs by increasing communication between caregivers.
The quality of healthcare delivered to a patient depends to a large extent on the quality of communication between caregivers. This is particularly true for older patients with complex needs. The municipal nurse in the Mobile Team can update homecare providers on new treatment and new medications. Sometimes, the communication between doctors from the county and homecare providers can become delayed. Since the Mobile Team only recruits nurses with experience from municipal care organizations, the nurses in the Mobile Team are familiar with the channels of communication in the municipality. This familiarity speeds up communication and creates added value to patients that obtain care from different caregivers.
The Mobile Team is a critical link in the integrated healthcare chain in Uppsala Municipality. The neighboring municipalities are examining the possibility of establishing similar mobile teams.
The combination of the medical expertise of the doctor from the county and of the network and the experience of the municipal nurse renders the Mobile Team more effective than its constituent parts. Integrated care requires that different care providers collaborate. Different healthcare providers must acknowledge each other, and they must understand each others’ abilities and limitations.
Healthcare professionals cannot become experts in isolation. High quality healthcare at home and the timely transfer of information to homecare organizations improve patient experiences and patient outcomes. The best healthcare at home will not in itself prevent the patient from falling ill a second time. A patient may need help cooking or remembering to take her medication. If the homecare team is not informed or fails to help the patient take her medication, the patient may soon fall ill again. This is just one example of the interdependencies of integrated care models. Each care provider depends on other care providers. Patients depend on multiple care providers.
The Mobile Team collaborates with nursing homes, ambulatory nurses, the emergency service at Uppsala University Hospital, and various homecare organizations. Follow this blog for more information about how the Mobile Service works with other healthcare providers.
This week is a special week in Stockholm. The Nobel Laureates of 2014 have come to Stockholm for a week full of events. Some of the events, like the Nobel Week Dialogue, are open to the public. This year, the topic of the dialogue was aging, so I could not stay away. I would like to share some of the impressions from the Nobel Week Dialogue.
I listened to the panel “Diseases of Aging.” For information on the panelists and to view the program of the Nobel Week Dialogue, please visit the Nobel Week Dialogue website.
The panelists and the audience discussed how the burden of disease changes as our population ages. More people suffer from stroke, from cancer, and from cardiovascular diseases. Many older people suffer from several diseases at the same time. One disease, such as obesity, is a risk factor for other diseases. Can we afford to treat these diseases in the future? Are there effective ways to prevent these diseases?
You can watch the panel discussion here. The discussion yielded some useful insights: We have not slowed the development of age related diseases like dementia. We have postponed the onset of age related diseases. We do not age more slowly. We age later in life.
When we stay physically active, we help our bodies and our minds to stay young. When we remain socially connected, we slow down the aging processes. When we learn, we activate parts of the brain that prevent us from aging. We ought to remain students throughout our lives.
Some age related diseases have common causes. If we can identify the common causes, we can prevent or delay several diseases at the same time. Once a person develops diseases, we must treat each disease separately. Professor Miia Kivipelto, a geriatric epidemiologist at the Karolinska Institute, argued that prevention is partly a political issue. We must make it easier for people to lead healthy lifestyles. Linda Partridge, Director of the University College London Institute of Health Aging, disagreed. She argued that raising taxes on unhealthy food would not prevent people from consuming sugary and fatty foods. We must persuade people to lead healthy lifestyles. We must educate people.
Professor Ingmar Skoog of the University of Gothenburgh highlighted another important point. He talked about early diagnosis. Most studies of dementia follow patients for a period of twenty years. What if the early signs of dementia are visible earlier than twenty years prior to the development of dementia? What if prevention as we see it today, such as exercise and cognitive training, are retarders of the disease? What if what we call prevention is not prevention? Perhaps we must understand the fundamental mechanics of the disease better. Perhaps we must learn how to diagnose dementia earlier than twenty years before the onset of the disease. Perhaps we must rethink prevention.
Sweden spends below five percent of healthcare costs on prevention, according to a recent report from the Forum for Welfare (Forum för välfärd). It is costly to screen people for diseases. We may need to screen one hundred thousand individuals to find the disease in one person who can benefit from an early treatment. The panelists and the audience talked about the importance of preventing diseases. What I missed from the lecture today was a discussion on cost effective prevention. The gains of prevention seem to be large. If we can reduce the costs of prevention, we could lower healthcare costs. We could offer early treatment.
The moderator, Göran Hansson, Professor at Karolinska Institutet asked the panelists if they believe we could repeat the success story of the reduction in smoking. Can we reduce obesity like we reduced smoking? Nobel Laureate Eric Kandel offered a positive view. We made it trendy not to smoke. Many people stopped smoking because it was no longer trendy to smoke. But Ms. Partridge countered with a pessimistic view. We were never made to smoke, but we were made to eat. Historically, the more we ate, the greater our chance of survival was. Evolution has equipped us with few tools to resist fatty foods. We have lived in abundance for a short period of time. Repeating the success story of smoking will be a challenge. Are you an optimist or a pessimist when it comes to reducing obesity in the world?
The discussions stimulated my curiosity. I want to learn about common causes of diseases related to old age. I want to know more about prevention of diabetes and early detection of dementia. The topics at Nobel Week Dialogue were relevant because the panelists discussed diseases that affect large groups of people. In Sweden, one hundred and fifty thousand individuals suffer from dementia, and two thirds of these people also suffer from Alzheimer´s Disease, according to the Swedish Dementia Register. There are over four hundred thousand individuals who suffer from diabetes in Sweden. And almost four hundred million people in the world suffer from diabetes, according to the International Diabetes Federation. These figures are growing.
I was happy to note that many young people attended the Nobel Week Dialogue. I am also grateful that Nobel Week Dialogue chose to focus on aging this year. ACCESS Health works actively to support young entrepreneurs who are interested in aging. Entrepreneurs in different countries participate in ACCESS Health incubator programs.
As previous authors of this blog have described, Modern Aging is an ACCESS Health project designed to encourage entrepreneurs to create new businesses to serve the needs of the elderly and the chronically ill. The Modern Aging project was first conceived and implemented in Sweden. Young entrepreneurs were selected to participate in a fourteen week educational program. The winner received money to start a company. ACCESS Health plans to replicate and expand the Modern Aging project in Europe, the United States, and Asia. Check out www.accessh.org for updates on the program and the Modern Aging Innovation Laboratory.
Warm greetings from Sweden!
My name is Sofia Widén. I am the new coordinator of this blog. I joined ACCESS Health International earlier this month as a program manager. I am studying integrated elder care and healthcare. I will identify global examples of good practice in integrated elder care, together with other members of the ACCESS Health team working on elder and long term care. Some of the ACCESS Health team members will be blogging with me here. We have projects in countries as diverse as India, mainland China, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Sweden. We will tell you about our work on this blog.
Right now, I am based in Sweden, and I plan on working in the United States next year. I graduated from the University of Edinburgh in June 2014, where I studied economics, politics, and languages. In my role at ACCESS Health, I will be blogging about my research, about articles that I read, and about topics such as elder care and healthcare. From time to time, I will write about related topics. I love writing and I love reading. I will tell you about inspiring people that I meet. I will tell you about the exiting things that I learn through my research. Please send me comments and interact with me. Please follow me on Twitter @SofiaWiden, and check out our website www.accessh.org.
I wish you all the best and I hope that you will enjoy our blog!
Ideas sometimes seem so simple and obviously great, so you ask yourself ”Why has nobody come up with that before?!”
I came across the innovative Speaking Exchange project, which is about lightening up the lives of elderly, while at the same time giving Brazilian students the opportunity to practice their English skills. Reports about this case seem to go viral on the web these very days (see links below).
I was so surprised and fascinated when I watched this clip about the Speaking Exchange:
The man shows the boy an old photo. “Is this your dad?” the boy asks. “No, It’s me and my wife when we were young”, he answers. “Oh you were good-looking when you were young”, the boy says – pause – “and you are still good-looking!”.
“I look like I’m only 25”, another man says. He and the boy a are laughing, “but I’m 88”. The two are having a nice conversation. In the end, they share a big, virtual hug.
The school uses its own digital tool for video chatting where conversations are recorded and uploaded privately for teachers to evaluate the talk language-wise.
But there is much more to this than just the language…
It’s fun and warms my heart to listen to their conversations about all the World and his brother.